Introduction

Kyrgyzstan gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991 but has remained closely intertwined with Russia’s geopolitical orbit. Over three decades, Bishkek and Moscow have built an extensive partnership grounded in security pacts, trade links, and cultural affinity, with some observers noting time and again that Kyrgyzstan is more controlled by Moscow than other Central Asian states [1]. Today the bilateral relationship rests on numerous agreements and institutions, from a 1992 friendship treaty to joint economic blocs and a Russian military base on Kyrgyz soil. Kyrgyzstan strikes a balance between reliance on Russia and cautious diversification, exemplified by its strategic silence over Russia’s actions in Ukraine, reflecting a multi-vector policy of avoiding open conflict with Moscow despite underlying unease [2].

Political relations

Elite ties & domestic leverage

Kyrgyzstan entered the post-Soviet era by aligning politically with Russia. In 1992, just months after independence, it signed a bilateral friendship treaty and joined the Moscow-led Collective Security Treaty, affirming Russia’s role as a guarantor of Kyrgyz sovereignty [3]. Throughout the 1990s President Askar Akayev maintained cordial ties with the Kremlin while also courting Western partners. Notably, Kyrgyzstan hosted a U.S. airbase at Manas from 2001 as part of the Afghanistan campaign, a decision tolerated by Russia early on but later contentious [1]. Kyrgyz politics have proven volatile: the country saw two presidents toppled by popular revolts (in 2005 and 2010) [1]. Each upheaval prompted recalibration in Bishkek’s foreign policy. After the 2005 “Tulip Revolution” brought Kurmanbek Bakiyev to power, he initially signaled greater openness to Moscow. By 2009, under Russian pressure and inducements, Bakiyev announced the eviction of U.S. forces from Manas, only to reverse course when Washington upped its rent, angering the Kremlin [1].

Russia’s influence loomed large during the 2010 crisis as well. Bakiyev was ousted amid protests and ethnic violence, and although the new interim government appealed for Russian peacekeepers, Moscow declined to send troops, instead urging a CIS-led diplomatic solution and providing humanitarian aid [4]. This underscored that while Kyrgyz leaders look to Moscow for support, Russia sets clear limits on direct intervention in internal conflicts. Subsequent leaders have hewed closely to Russia’s line. Under President Almazbek Atambayev (2011–2017), Kyrgyzstan cemented its alliance with Moscow – closing the U.S. base in 2014 under evident Kremlin pressure and formally joining the Eurasian Economic Union the following year [1]. The removal of the Western military footprint marked what analysts called Kyrgyzstan’s new era as a de facto Russian “client state,” with Moscow asserting itself as Bishkek’s primary foreign policy and security partner [1]. Russia rewarded this loyalty by forgiving nearly $500 million in Kyrgyz debt and extending its military base lease to 2032 [1].

Information/legal diffusion & external pressures

Under President Sooronbay Jeenbekov (2017–2020) and his successor Sadyr Japarov (from 2020), Kyrgyzstan has remained firmly in Russia’s orbit. Japarov has consolidated power domestically and adopted laws mirroring Russian crackdowns on civil society, moving the country toward authoritarianism akin to its neighbors [5]. Yet he also courts other partners like China and Turkey, reflecting careful hedging [6]. Kyrgyzstan notably refrains from endorsing Russian aggression abroad: it abstained on UN resolutions condemning the 2022 invasion of Ukraine [7] and avoided any official critique of Moscow, practicing a “strategic silence” that signals neutrality despite its security dependence [2]. At the same time, Moscow’s sway over Kyrgyz politics endures through media influence, elite networks, and public sentiment historically favorable to Russia’s presence [1].

Other external actors have sought to shape Kyrgyzstan’s political landscape as well. China’s rising economic leverage and infrastructure investments give Beijing growing influence [8]. Additionally, a liberal religious policy and open channels for ideological and financial support from Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the Indian Subcontinent catalysed a mosque-building surge, passing 1,000 by the mid-1990s and 2,669 by 2016, visibly reviving religious practice in an officially secular state [9]. While foreign funding sparked the expansion, subsequent growth has been bankrolled mainly by domestic patrons, including members of parliament, entrenching more conservative Islamic currents in local politics and community life [9]. These diverse influences have not displaced Russia’s primacy, but they illustrate the multidirectional pressures on Kyrgyzstan’s leadership. Balancing between Moscow’s expectations, domestic public opinion, and new partners’ appeals has become a defining feature of Kyrgyz politics.

Economic ties

Trade & re-exports

Russia has long been one of Kyrgyzstan’s top economic partners, but its once-dominant position is gradually being challenged. As of 2022, Russia and China together account for around 60% of Kyrgyz imports and nearly half of its exports [10]. China has eclipsed Russia in trade volume, yet Kyrgyzstan still relies on Russian staples like fuel and wheat and benefits from Russian-bound re-export traffic through its bazaars, leaving its economy exposed to Russia’s fortunes [11]. Labour migration further cements the bond as roughly a million Kyrgyz citizens work in Russia, and their remittances make up some 27% of Kyrgyzstan’s GDP (2022) [2]. A downturn in Russia or new restrictions on migrants would therefore send painful shockwaves through Kyrgyz households.

Energy/logistics & migration–remittances

Moscow has used economic levers to reinforce its influence. In 2014, Russian energy giant Gazprom acquired Kyrgyzstan’s failing gas utility for a symbolic $1, assuming its debts and rehabilitating supply [1]. This ensured Kyrgyz consumers reliable gas but also locked them into dependence on Russian fuel. Likewise, the promise of privileged access to Russian markets drove Kyrgyzstan’s decision to join the Eurasian Economic Union in 2015 [1]. That step initially brought costly regulatory adjustments, but over time it eased the flow of Kyrgyz goods and migrant labour to Russia. Russia has periodically provided financial lifelines too, writing off Kyrgyz debt to keep Bishkek in its orbit [12]. Meanwhile, Kyrgyz leaders have quietly courted alternative investors to avoid economic overreliance, welcoming Chinese loans for infrastructure and seeking investment from partners like Turkey and Gulf states [6]. As the Ukraine war has shown, heavy dependence on any single partner carries risks: Western sanctions on Moscow have disrupted supply chains and spurred inflation in Kyrgyzstan, even as some local traders profited by redirecting sanctioned goods. The upshot is a greater desire in Bishkek for economic flexibility, so it can pivot as needed between Russia’s market and those of emerging alternative partners.

Security and military cooperation

Security ties between Kyrgyzstan and Russia are robust, rooted in both bilateral arrangements and multilateral alliances. Russia has maintained a military presence in Kyrgyzstan since the early 2000s, centered on the Kant airbase near Bishkek. Opened in 2003 under a 15-year agreement (later extended to 2032), the Kant base hosts some 500–600 Russian troops and warplanes as part of the CSTO rapid-deployment forces [1]. Moscow also retains several auxiliary facilities, including a naval test range at Lake Issyk-Kul. For Kyrgyzstan, whose own military is relatively small, the Russian base and CSTO membership provide hard security guarantees. Kyrgyz forces regularly join joint exercises with Russia and other CSTO allies, and many Kyrgyz officers train at Russian military academies, reflecting the continued interoperability of their armed forces [13]. Russia has been the principal supplier of Kyrgyzstan’s military equipment, furnishing over 50% of its arms imports in recent decades (often at subsidized rates or as aid) [2]. Moscow also pledged a US$1.1 billion package of weapons and gear to bolster Kyrgyzstan’s army, part of an effort to modernize its ally’s defenses and keep pace with regional threats [1].

Despite this deep cooperation, Russia’s responses to Kyrgyzstan’s security crises have varied. During Kyrgyzstan’s 2010 internal unrest, the CSTO (then chaired by Russia) declined Bishkek’s pleas for intervention, limiting itself to statements of concern and dispatching advisors rather than troops, arguing the mix of revolution and ethnic clashes fell outside the alliance’s defense mandate [4]. In contrast, when Kazakhstan faced mass unrest in January 2022, Kyrgyzstan joined all CSTO members in promptly deploying forces at Moscow’s request [14]. The Kyrgyz parliament sent 150 soldiers with armored vehicles as part of a 2,500-strong CSTO “peacekeeping” mission, the first-ever CSTO intervention, to guard strategic sites in Almaty [15]. This short-lived operation demonstrated Kyrgyzstan’s readiness to back Russia-led security efforts beyond its borders. Just months later, however, Kyrgyzstan was embroiled in border fighting with Tajikistan (another CSTO member). Again the CSTO avoided direct involvement, but Moscow worked behind the scenes to broker a ceasefire while urging a “political and diplomatic” resolution of the dispute [16].

Overall, Russia remains Kyrgyzstan’s primary security patron. It provides intelligence and counterterrorism cooperation and continues to equip and train Kyrgyz forces to a degree unmatched by any other partner. Kyrgyzstan has shown loyalty to collective defense efforts under Russian leadership, while carefully avoiding entanglement in Russia’s offensive wars. Bishkek has not sent troops to Moscow’s conflicts in Ukraine or elsewhere, and it tightly limits Western military access on its soil (the U.S. base closure in 2014 being the prime example). This alignment delivers stability and material support to Kyrgyzstan’s security sector, but it also reinforces the country’s dependence on Russia’s military strategy and diplomatic calculus in Central Asia. As new security challenges emerge, from border demarcation issues to transnational militancy, Kyrgyzstan’s defense posture will likely remain anchored to its alliance with Moscow, even as it quietly diversifies training and equipment sources on the margins.

Memberships and Treaties

• 1992 – Foundational accords: Kyrgyzstan signs a Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance with Russia and joins the CIS Collective Security Treaty, cementing a post-Soviet alliance.
• 2001 – SCO co-founder: Kyrgyzstan co-founds the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation alongside Russia, China and three neighbours, bolstering multilateral security cooperation.
• 2002 – CSTO formed: Kyrgyzstan and five other states establish the Collective Security Treaty Organization, institutionalising their 1992 mutual-defense pact under Russian leadership.
• 2003 – Russian base at Kant: Russia opens its Kant airbase in Kyrgyzstan, its first new foreign military base since Soviet times, under a 15-year basing agreement (later extended).
• 2005 – Tulip Revolution: Kyrgyzstan’s first post-Soviet uprising ousts President Akayev. New President Kurmanbek Bakiyev initially pledges fealty to Moscow but soon pursues a multi-vector policy, straining relations.
• 2010 – Second revolution: Another popular revolt topples President Bakiyev amid interethnic violence. Russia supports Kyrgyzstan’s interim authorities diplomatically, but the CSTO declines to deploy forces to restore order.
• 2012 – Extended base deal: Moscow writes off $500 million of Kyrgyz debt in exchange for a 15-year extension of Russia’s military base leases, securing its presence until at least 2032.
• 2014 – Manas closure: Kyrgyzstan closes the U.S. airbase at Manas under Russian pressure, ending the American military presence. Moscow welcomes the move as affirming Kyrgyzstan’s exclusive security alignment with Russia.
• 2015 – Eurasian union entry: Kyrgyzstan becomes a full member of the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union, deepening economic integration and enabling freer movement of goods and labor.
• 2017 – Alliance reaffirmed: Presidents Vladimir Putin and Almazbek Atambayev sign a declaration on strengthening the Kyrgyz–Russian alliance and strategic partnership, underscoring their close political and military ties.
• 2020 – Power shift: Mass protests over a disputed election force President Jeenbekov to resign. New leader Sadyr Japarov assumes office and reiterates Kyrgyzstan’s alliance with Russia amid internal power consolidation.
• 2022 – Joint intervention: For the first time, Kyrgyzstan sends troops abroad in a CSTO mission – a contingent helps quell unrest in Kazakhstan, demonstrating loyalty to Moscow’s security bloc.
• 2022 – Neutral on Ukraine: Kyrgyzstan stays neutral on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It abstains in UN votes criticizing Moscow and quietly manages sanctions fallout, while absorbing an influx of Russian émigrés.
• 2022 – New railway deal: China, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan sign a long-delayed agreement to build a direct railway link bypassing Russian territory, signalling Bishkek’s pursuit of alternative trade routes [17].

Conclusion and Outlook

Kyrgyzstan’s relationship with Russia appears set to endure through 2030, but its exact trajectory is far from predictable. On one hand, deeper alignment could see Bishkek doubling down on the Russian partnership. Signs would include Kyrgyzstan further synchronizing its laws and security posture with Moscow, perhaps even inviting expanded Russian investments or military presence as insurance amid regional uncertainty. This path might be reinforced by President Japarov’s increasingly authoritarian governance style, which mirrors Moscow’s and leaves little room for Western influence. Alternatively, Kyrgyzstan might quietly diversify – a hedging approach capitalizing on Chinese infrastructure projects, Gulf states’ financial outreach, and regional initiatives like the new railway – while still keeping Russia as its chief patron. Such balance would seek to extract economic benefits from all sides and avoid overdependence on any single partner. A more turbulent friction scenario is also conceivable. If Russian demands (over sanctions evasion or migrant labor issues, for example) begin to clash with Kyrgyz national interests or public opinion, Bishkek could face pressure to assert its sovereignty. Given Kyrgyzstan’s history of sudden upheavals and the added influence of rising domestic Islamic sentiment, no forecast can be made with absolute certainty – except that the coming years will test the resilience and flexibility of the Kyrgyz–Russian alliance.

Literature

1. Ott, S. ‘Russia tightens control over Kyrgyzstan’ (The Guardian, 2014) <https://theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/18/russia-tightens-control-over-kyrgyzstan> accessed 21 August 2025.
2. Clingendael Institute, ‘Russia as a systemic factor (Central Asia emerging from the shadows)’ (Report, 2025) <https://www.clingendael.org/pub/2025/central-asia-emerging-from-the-shadows/5-russia-as-a-systemic-factor/> accessed 21 August 2025.
3. Collective Security Treaty Organisation, ‘The Kyrgyz Republic’ (CSTO, 1992) <https://en.odkb-csto.org/countries/kyrgyzstan/> accessed 21 August 2025.
4. Blagov, S. ‘Russia, CSTO, SCO Struggle to Settle Kyrgyz Unrest’ (Eurasia Daily Monitor, 2010) <https://jamestown.org/program/russia-csto-sco-struggle-to-settle-kyrgyz-unrest> accessed 21 August 2025.
5. Pannier, B. ‘Kyrgyzstan: Central Asia’s Island of Democracy Sinks Into Authoritarianism’ (FPRI, 2024) <https://www.fpri.org/article/2024/04/kyrgyzstan-central-asias-island-of-democracy-sinks-into-authoritarianism> accessed 21 August 2025.
6. SpecialEurasia OSINT Team, ‘Geopolitics of Kyrgyzstan between Russia, China, and Turkey’ (SpecialEurasia, 2023) <https://www.specialeurasia.com/2023/12/28/geopolitics-of-kyrgyzstan-asia/> accessed 22 August 2025.
7.  The Associated Press, ‘countries abstained on the UNGA vote condemning Russia’ (AP News, 2023) <https://apnews.com/article/53c2b369350d2870aae2356ade4434f1> accessed 22 August 2025.
8. Gladstone, R. ‘China’s Growing Role in Central Asia’ (E-International Relations, 2025) <https://www.e-ir.info/2025/02/16/chinas-growing-role-in-central-asia/> accessed 22 August 2025.
9. Engvall, J. ‘Religion and the Secular State in Kyrgyzstan’ (Swedish Defence Research Agency, 2020) <https://www.foi.se/download/18.5484aa61725645f64f28d/1592307207108/Religion-and-the-Secular-State-in-Kyrgyzstan_Johan-Engvall-10-06-20_FINAL-wCover.pdf> accessed 22 August 2025.
10. Tilekeyev, K. ‘Kyrgyzstan’s re-export model: A blessing and a curse’ (Capsulock, 2025) <https://capsunlock.org/kyrgyzstans-re-export-model-a-blessing-and-a-curse/> accessed 22 August 2025.
11. Kirillova, K. ‘Russia Alienates Central Asia’ (Center for European Policy Analysis, 2025) <https://cepa.org/article/russia-alienates-central-asia> accessed 19 August 2025.
12. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, ‘Russia’s Menu of Manipulation in Kyrgyzstan’ (2023) <https://www.cacianalyst.org/resources/231127_FT_Kyrgyzstan_Engvall.pdf> accessed 26 August 2025
13. RIA Novosti, ‘Эксперты: РФ и Киргизия обсуждают поставки ЗРК “Бук-М1” и вертолетов Ми-8’ (2020) <https://ria.ru/20200518/1571589839.html> accessed 26 August 2025.
14. Pannier, B. ‘How the Intervention in Kazakhstan Revitalized the Russian-led CSTO’ (FPRI, 2022) <https://www.fpri.org/article/2022/03/how-the-intervention-in-kazakhstan-revitalized-the-russian-led-csto> accessed 26 August 2025.
15. Xinhua, ‘Kyrgyz president signs decree on sending peacekeepers to Kazakhstan’ (2022) <https://english.news.cn/20220108/ae2ff2f5b444415783af9ae8eb524bae/c.html> accessed 27 August 2025.
16. Collective Security Treaty Organization, ‘Commentary on the situation on the Kyrgyz-Tajik Border’ (2022) <https://en.odkb-csto.org/news/news_odkb/kommentariy-sekretariata-odkb-po-situatsii-na-kyrgyzsko-tadzhikskoy-granitse/> accessed 27 August 2025.
17. Kudryavtseva, T. ‘Construction of China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway estimated at $8 billion’ (24.kg News, 2024) <https://24.kg/english/290734_Construction_of_China__Kyrgyzstan__Uzbekistan_railway_estimated_at_8_billion/> accessed 27 August 2025.